Honours and Employability: Perceived Value, Null Effects, and Decision Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63608/ssj.3942Keywords:
Employability, Propensity Score Matching, Expectancy Theory, Signalling, Legal education, HonoursAbstract
This study examines the gap between law graduates’ perceived employability value of the Bachelor of Laws (Honours)
and actual employment outcomes. Using a convergent mixed-methods survey of Bachelor of Laws (LLB) alumni (n = 66),
we integrate perception data with propensity score matching analysis comparing Honours and non-Honours graduates.
Honours completers reported substantially higher perceived job-market value (M = 3.91 vs. 2.56), yet causal analysis
revealed no effect on legal-sector employment (ATE = 0 percentage points, 95% CI [−48.8, 48.4]). We interpret this pattern
through expectancy theory and decision psychology: heterogeneous Honours models weaken completion–outcome
linkages, while confirmation bias elevates post-decision perceptions among Honours graduates. The tentative findings
suggest a need for evidence-based program communication and transparent outcomes reporting to align student
expectations with realistic employment payoffs. This research informs advising practices and Honours program design in
law schools, with implications for credential evaluation across professional education contexts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aaron Timoshanko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International Licence (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.




